What happens if a judge finds a product is not adulterated or misbranded after being tagged?

When a judge determines that a product is not adulterated or misbranded, it indicates that the product meets the required safety and labeling standards and can be legally sold. In this case, removing the tag signifies that the product has been rectified in terms of compliance and is ready for sale under normal conditions. The removal of the tag by the pharmacy indicates that the product is no longer under the scrutiny that necessitated the tagging, allowing the pharmacy to resume its normal business operations concerning that product.

The other options would not be appropriate actions in this context. For instance, destroying a product that has been found compliant is unnecessary and wasteful. Selling the product without restriction may suggest a lack of oversight, but once verified by a judge, the removal of the tag is a clear signal that the product is compliant. Keeping the tag until further notice would contradict the judge's ruling and imply ongoing scrutiny despite clearance. Therefore, the correct action after the judge's finding is to duly remove the tag by the pharmacy.